Review – A brief analysis of the thesis, which reflects its relevance, features, advantages, disadvantages. The review assesses your work . It is important that it be positive and, at the same time, objective. Members of the commission should believe that a person wrote her who has nothing in common with you or your supervisor. Get amazing tips about writing thesis here

Ideally, this should be a person who has a diploma in your specialty (or better, a scientific degree). He should not work in the same department with your supervisor.

How to find a reviewer?

It’s simple. If you are writing a thesis on the basis of a study that was carried out at any enterprise, a review can be made by the head of the organization. You can use the help of a senior manager or assistant (deputy) manager. If you wrote a thesis on the basis of someone’s scientific works, research of a work of art, media or other sources of information to which free access is possible, it will be more difficult to find a reviewer.

In this case, you can contact the representative of the company in which you had practice during training. As a last resort, a loyal teacher will surely help with the search for a specialist to his supervisor.

Important tip!

As a rule, potential reviewers are not eager to read the work of students and do a detailed analysis. Do not rely on a detailed and good review. At best, the reviewer will agree to leave his signature . Namely, it is usually required.

You will need to write or order a review yourself and provide it to a specialist. He will leave his signature and the problem will be solved.

Easier said than done. Writing a thesis review is difficult. Especially if you are doing this. On the one hand, who knows the advantages and disadvantages of the work better than its author? On the other hand, students usually do not write reviews, and this work is new to most graduates. Yes, and to change the style of presentation so that the commission did not suspect a forgery, even an experienced author cannot always.

Read More: How DevOps Training is Beneficial for IT Professionals

However, whom we cheat. Independent writing of a thesis review is a common thing, and many universities do not pay attention to authorship. It doesn’t matter who wrote it, more importantly who signed it.

How to write a review of the thesis?

It is easier and cheaper to write a thesis review yourself and bring the reviewer to an assessment. That will put the signature and, if necessary, will assure in the personnel department. It is important that the review:

  • was kept in a different style (however, this is a controversial issue);
  • complied with the requirements for registration and had a clear structure;
  • contained a complete analysis of the thesis.

A review is not a review and not an essay , and it is definitely not worth writing it in free form. We will begin with the form.

Read More: Online Education vs. Offline Education

Registration of a thesis review:

So, you need to write 1-2 pages of text in Times New Roman font (14 pt) with one and a half lines. There will be about 2000-3000 characters without spaces (you can check with Word statistics if you are interested in the volume).

Contents of the thesis review:

With the design there is nothing complicated. The question is different – how to write the very review of the thesis. We analyze the points.

1. Introduction:

Greater injections are not required. Very briefly, in one or two phrases, describe what exactly the work is relevant for the field of knowledge or field of activity to which the study is devoted. This can be found in the introduction to the diploma itself.

2. The main part:

It contains the actual analysis of the thesis. We start with:

  1. a) General assessment – we tell you if the presentation is logical, whether chapters are proportionate, whether there are conclusions in each chapter, whether there are enough applications and illustrations, whether the style is respected
  2. b) Evaluation of each chapter:

– in the first we evaluate the presentation – style, structure, consistency, the actual wording;

– in the second note the quality and depth of analysis of the collected materials, the logic of the conclusions;

– in the third we analyze the practical benefits of the research, note how the author’s conclusions and recommendations actually helped (it can be written that the conclusions made by the author were tested in the company).

3. Conclusion:

Here we make a general final assessment, briefly describing the advantages and disadvantages of the work. At the end we put an assessment (on a five-point scale). For example:

Assessment can be set independently after an objective analysis. If you feel that the work frankly does not reach even “good”, it is better not to put “excellent” in the review. On the other hand, modesty does not always decorate, and even if there are some minor flaws in your work, set yourself “excellent”. This will be another argument in favor of the real five.

The advantages and disadvantages should be discussed separately. Describing the benefits, try to specify. For example, instead of:

Qualification work has a clear structure and is useful in this field of activity.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here